Skip to content

docs: 学习会:计算机协会9月项目茶谈 - #192

Merged
m1ngsama merged 4 commits into
nbtca:mainfrom
sheepkinn:edit/archived-2026-2026-09-29-meeting-20260929134307
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

m1ngsama merged 4 commits into
nbtca:mainfrom
sheepkinn:edit/archived-2026-2026-09-29-meeting-20260929134307

Conversation

@sheepkinn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

学习会:计算机协会9月项目茶谈

由 sheepkinn 在 docs.nbtca.space 上编辑。

@sheepkinn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

😵 Turns out the online editor automatically adds this at the very top of the document:

---
summary: 计算机协会与电竞社一起讨论与分享百团大战的招新安排
archive:
  date: "2026-09-16"
  source: "协会自有记录,随本仓库保存"
  transcriber: "sheepkinn"
  transcribed: "2026.09"
---

And the very first line has to be ---

I accidentally put a space before it, which caused the lint check to fail twice 😵

@m1ngsama m1ngsama changed the title docs: 学习会:计算机协会9月项目茶谈 docs(archived): add the September project tea talk record Sep 30, 2026
@m1ngsama m1ngsama changed the title docs(archived): add the September project tea talk record docs: 学习会:计算机协会9月项目茶谈 Sep 30, 2026

@m1ngsama m1ngsama left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, this is a solid record. I pushed one commit on top:

  • Renamed the file to 2026-09-28-project-tea-talk.md, since the meeting was on the 28th.
  • Put author: sheepkinn back. Deleting the editor's block removed it, and without it the page card reads “原件未署名”.
  • Matched the title and summary to the other 2026 records, fixed the Lan-Yuri link text, and dropped .html from internal links.

The double frontmatter came from the editor, not from you: it adds its own block on submit. #193 now stops a draft that starts with ---.

@m1ngsama
m1ngsama merged commit 0f753ff into nbtca:main Sep 30, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants