Fix/erc20 bridgeable invalid sender

.changeset/tricky-deer-greet.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+---
+"@perfect-abstractions/compose": patch
+---
+
+use ERC20InvalidSender instead of ERC20InvalidReceiver for zero address _from in crosschainburn by @Jayy4rl

src/token/ERC20/Bridgeable/ERC20BridgeableFacet.sol

@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ contract ERC20BridgeableFacet {
         _requireRole("trusted-bridge");
 
         if (_from == address(0)) {
-            revert ERC20InvalidReceiver(address(0));
+            revert ERC20InvalidSender(address(0));
         }
 
         uint256 accountBalance = erc20Storage.balanceOf[_from];

src/token/ERC20/Bridgeable/ERC20BridgeableMod.sol

@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ function crosschainBurn(address _from, uint256 _value) {
     _requireRole("trusted-bridge");
 
     if (_from == address(0)) {
-        revert ERC20InvalidReceiver(address(0));
+        revert ERC20InvalidSender(address(0));
     }
 
     uint256 accountBalance = erc20Storage.balanceOf[_from];

test/trees/ERC20.tree

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Bridgeable
 │   ├── when caller does not have trusted-bridge role
 │   │   └── it should revert with AccessControlUnauthorizedAccount
 │   ├── when from is zero address
-│   │   └── it should revert with ERC20InvalidReceiver
+│   │   └── it should revert with ERC20InvalidSender
 │   ├── when from balance is less than the amount
 │   │   └── it should revert with ERC20InsufficientBalance
 │   └── when caller has trusted-bridge role and from has sufficient balance

test/unit/token/ERC20/Bridgeable/facet/fuzz/crosschainBurn.t.sol

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ contract CrosschainBurn_ERC20BridgeableFacet_Fuzz_Unit_Test is ERC20BridgeableFa
         seedTrustedBridge(users.admin);
         vm.stopPrank();
         vm.prank(users.admin);
-        vm.expectRevert(abi.encodeWithSelector(ERC20BridgeableFacet.ERC20InvalidReceiver.selector, ADDRESS_ZERO));
+        vm.expectRevert(abi.encodeWithSelector(ERC20BridgeableFacet.ERC20InvalidSender.selector, ADDRESS_ZERO));
         facet.crosschainBurn(ADDRESS_ZERO, value);
     }