Skip to content

PR#1497 — Merge main into staging - #1498

Merged
github-actions[bot] merged 5 commits into
stagingfrom
update-staging-34156125711
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

PR#1497 — Merge main into staging#1498
github-actions[bot] merged 5 commits into
stagingfrom
update-staging-34156125711

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automatically merge main into staging branch.

juanmleng and others added 5 commits August 31, 2026 14:11
The Create Artifact step's Title and Description now accept the same variables
the Broadcast step's Subject and Message accept, so an artifact raised by a
workflow can name the record it runs against — and, on a breach-triggered
workflow, the metric that breached.

- Workflow step types: a footnote on Title covering both fields, following the
  pattern the Broadcast rows use. It notes that variables which cannot be
  filled in for this step are not offered, and that Title is stored as plain
  text while Description keeps its formatting.
- Trigger workflows on threshold breach: the breach-details section covered
  broadcasts only, so it is widened to both steps and retitled. The
  trigger-change warning now says the rejection names the step as well as the
  variable, and the "what a breach sends" note records that one artifact is
  raised per breach rather than per failing reading.

The retitled section changes its anchor, so the Broadcast footnote's link to it
is repointed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Monitoring Breach table was retitled from "broadcast variables" to
"variables" and moved under a section covering both the Broadcast and
Create Artifact steps, but it still lists Monitoring Document URL
without qualification. That variable is withheld from Create Artifact,
along with Record URL, so a reader following this page opens the picker
and cannot find the row the table promised.

Mark the row, and say why once: a link is written differently for each
reader, so it suits a step that writes its text once per recipient and
not one that writes once and stores the result for everyone. The step
types footnote gave two reasons for a variable being absent -- no
recipient, and no artifact yet -- and neither covers a link, so it gains
the same sentence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011uw61mH5X2xvAG6XQobTVh
…s-in-create-artifact-step

[SC-18126] Insert variables in the Create Artifact step's title and description
@github-actions
github-actions Bot merged commit 8bb139a into staging Sep 7, 2026
@github-actions
github-actions Bot deleted the update-staging-34156125711 branch September 7, 2026 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant