Skip to content

docs: orphan sweep round 2 - five checks run, four close - #603

Merged
swares merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/orphan-sweep-round-2
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

swares merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/orphan-sweep-round-2

Conversation

@swares

@swares swares commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

1.4 mdadm ARRAY lines were already pinned by UUID on both arrays. 6.12's UDMA_CRC question - carried in STANDUP.md for weeks as an unresolved hardware fault - is raw 0 on all four disks. 3.15's node_exporter is producing 45 backup-* unit series. 2.13's token appears 0 times in either shell history, counted rather than printed since a grep -n that finds it displays it.

Four of the five were already true and never recorded. Nobody had run the command, so the entries aged as though the work were outstanding.

The fifth is the instructive one: app_pwhash is present on both resolvers, which confirms the problem rather than closing it. The checkbox was phrased as a finding, not an action, so no amount of checking could tick it - rewritten as the decision it needs. A backlog item phrased as an observation cannot be completed.

Also records that a naive parser reports 17 orphans where 12 remain: sections 5 and 9 hold items as bullets with no ### entry, so a parser tracking the last heading misattributes three of them to unrelated entries. Adds an item to give those sections real entries.

1.4 mdadm ARRAY lines were already pinned by UUID on both arrays. 6.12's UDMA_CRC question - carried in STANDUP.md for weeks as an unresolved hardware fault - is raw 0 on all four disks. 3.15's node_exporter is producing 45 backup-* unit series. 2.13's token appears 0 times in either shell history, counted rather than printed since a grep -n that finds it displays it.

Four of the five were already true and never recorded. Nobody had run the command, so the entries aged as though the work were outstanding.

The fifth is the instructive one: app_pwhash is present on both resolvers, which confirms the problem rather than closing it. The checkbox was phrased as a finding, not an action, so no amount of checking could tick it - rewritten as the decision it needs. A backlog item phrased as an observation cannot be completed.

Also records that a naive parser reports 17 orphans where 12 remain: sections 5 and 9 hold items as bullets with no ### entry, so a parser tracking the last heading misattributes three of them to unrelated entries. Adds an item to give those sections real entries.
@swares
swares merged commit 9de8af7 into main Sep 20, 2026
4 checks passed
@swares
swares deleted the docs/orphan-sweep-round-2 branch September 20, 2026 16:25
swares added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2026
#603 landed the round-2 sweep while this branch carried a re-applied superset of it - I declared that work lost and rewrote it without checking git branch -r first, which CLAUDE.md warns about by name.

Resolved to HEAD in all six hunks. Five were wording differences between two drafts of the same text; one was factual - the measured sdd flags are 0x003e, and #603 had 0x0032 truncated. Folded back the one thing only #603 had: the arithmetic showing how a hand count read 17 orphans where 12 remained, kept as the worked example that justifies the script.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant