Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
size-limit report 📦
|
basit3407
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 13, 2026 07:33
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Do not merge until the backend sends
sourceAppin production. The field is invisible to clients until then, so this is safe to review now but must not be released early.What
Adds the optional
sourceAppobject to theQuranReflectPostresponse type, with a new exportedQuranReflectPostSourceApptype ({ name: string; url: string }).PostSourceAppDtoandPostSerialized.sourceAppinquran/quran.com-users-backend(PR #1891, ported in #1920 main, #1921 pre-live, #1922 staging, #1923 testing).sourceAppis present only when the creating partner app is configured for attribution and was verified as a Gateway-authenticated OAuth client at creation. It is omitted, nevernull, for native, unverified, and unconfigured posts. The type is thereforesourceApp?: QuranReflectPostSourceApp, and a test assertsnullis rejected by the type.quranReflect.v1.postsfacade (get,create,update) and whereverQuranReflectPostis used.minorchangeset for@quranjs/api. No runtime code changes; responses already pass unknown fields through.Checks run
vitest run test/quran-reflect-post-types.test.tspasses (type surface compile check covering the new type, an attributed post, a native post, and a@ts-expect-errorfornull).eslinton the touched files is clean. The full suite was not run (loaded machine); CI will.Release notes
Changeset added:
.changeset/quran-reflect-post-source-app.md.🤖 Generated with Claude Code