feat(import): simplify review and strengthen reconciliation

[DeusExTaco]

Summary

• Replace the crowded Step 3 screen with focused review lanes and scoped series/file decisions while preserving import execution and completed-job Follow-up.
• Improve stale Mylar reference reconciliation, scan-count clarity, conflicting-copy review, one-page archive previews, and exact lettered issue identities.
• Add an explicit background series-folder rescan for new or missed files, with safe registration and unresolved items routed to import review.
• Preserve the detected archive format during registration and repair, and support rescan queries on both SQLite and PostgreSQL.
• Require canonical numeric ComicVine resource IDs before constructing detail-request paths.

Validation

• The preceding branch checkpoint passed local make ci-full: 11,478 main tests, 91.07% coverage, 575 browser tests per browser, 25 accessibility checks, and 7 production-container smoke tests.
• Review fixes: 140 focused rescan, registration, archive-signature, and reader tests passed; Ruff and strict mypy passed. Regression tests first reproduced both reported defects.
• Actual PostgreSQL execution verified job isolation, JSON outcome counts, failed/null outcomes, and paged rescan reports. SQLite execution is covered by the regression suite.
• Real-file acceptance: selected one comic, deferred another, verified persistence across reload, completed the import, opened the recovery modal, and recovered the deferred comic through the same background endpoint used by Save recovery choices. Both issues are owned, both source hashes are unchanged, and the resolved row disappears from Follow-up.
• Two existing browser checks were skipped for unavailable fixture states. This targeted acceptance check does not claim exhaustive manual coverage of every button combination.
• Full GitHub CI, security, CodeQL, workflow hygiene, and production Docker validation passed on final PR commit 74348b4 before merge. Both review findings are resolved.
• Final follow-up: 122 focused provider/assignment tests passed, including 14 new malformed-ID cases. Both full browser suites passed again (575 each, 2 skipped each); history coverage now asserts both sort directions independently of other tests' source paths.

Release Notes

• Intended for the next edge build, not a stable-version release.
• Includes the series-rescan job-type migration; take a normal database backup before upgrading.
• Source preservation, exact issue ownership, archive safety, partial imports, retries, and completed-import recovery remain enforced.
• No security exceptions or runner access permissions were changed.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-17T02:36:43.350233Z	6ea5d05	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6ea5d056fb

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".