fix: incorrect env var for base64 signature

[nikhilsinhaparseable]

current env prompt - P_LICENSE_SIGNATURE_BASE64_FILE_PATH -- incorrect server never expects base64 file path

update to P_LICENSE_SIGNATURE_BASE64

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Updated enterprise setup to prompt for the license signature value directly.
  • Revised the displayed label for this setup prompt.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Essentials

Run ID: afeabba2-6ce3-4d5d-8c07-6219bc0ac07e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 936000f and bd6c778.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/interactive.rs

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

The enterprise setup prompt now requests the license signature through P_LICENSE_SIGNATURE_BASE64 instead of a file path variable. The prompt display label was also updated.

Changes

Enterprise license prompt

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update signature prompt src/interactive.rs	The enterprise license prompt now collects the base64 signature directly through P_LICENSE_SIGNATURE_BASE64.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to bd6c7

Enterprise setup now requests the base64 license signature through the server-expected environment variable, with no identified merge-readiness risk.

Poem

A rabbit types a key,
The license blooms in base64,
No file path hops along,
The prompt now names the way,
And setup ends with cheer.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the fix to the incorrect base64 signature environment variable. It is concise and matches the main change.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description clearly states the incorrect variable and the replacement expected by the server. It omits the template headings and testing checklist, but it provides the essential context for this s…
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description clearly states the incorrect variable and the replacement expected by the server. It omits the template headings and testing checklist, but it provides the essential context for this small change.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}