Explain nonlinear wins with a worked example in the README - #16
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The README now gives nonlinear wins a dedicated section near the top, explaining why a hybrid earns a place between neighboring baselines.
The original 4B example shows the measured hybrid at 0.006632 KLD versus a straight-line comparison of approximately 0.007611 at the same size, about 12.9% lower. The research showcase includes the interpolation formula and links to the preserved source evidence.
Validation: all eight Python documentation/release tests passed;
git diff --checkpassed. Documentation only.