chore(semantics): refresh project registry I/O metadata

[Duang777]

Summary

• regenerate the checked-in project registry I/O manifest from current main
• update only the four moved source line metadata entries
• restore the architecture census gate used by active pull requests

Baseline evidence

At exact base 4efafaf16b4fab1aa99e8e45d0aedb7a044820b2, test_checked_in_project_registry_io_manifest_is_current reports four metadata drifts in manager context, Chat, and Lark team-plan reads. The repository generator reports 231 sites and 0 unclassified direct sites.

Validation

• python scripts/generate_project_registry_io_manifest.py --check
• pytest -q tests/architecture/test_project_registry_io_census.py::test_checked_in_project_registry_io_manifest_is_current tests/architecture/test_goal_instance_binding_inventory.py (4 passed)
• git diff --check
• standard diff-selected premerge (3 direct checks and 2 catalog canaries passed)

This PR contains no runtime behavior change.

[Duang777]

@huangruiteng Please review the refreshed manifest at exact head 52c6bdf244c9de129f255544951fa91219c174d4.

This branch now includes main through 4a41193de827b48b4d09efb9b84f92366ae62a0b, including merged PR #4949. The canonical project registry I/O manifest was regenerated after that merge: 232 sites, 0 unclassified direct sites. Relative to the merged main, the PR still changes only loopx/semantics/project_registry_io_manifest_v1.json (20 insertions, 12 deletions).

Exact-head local verification:

• manifest check: 232 sites, current;
• project registry I/O census plus Goal binding inventory: 9 passed;
• diff check passed;
• standard premerge passed all 3 direct checks and 2 selected catalog canaries.

The previous Windows failure belonged to the superseded run and reproduced the two base issues fixed by #4986. The push started fresh DCO, dependency-review, release, and Python checks for this exact head.

[huangruiteng]

动机

#4990 修复 project registry I/O 架构清单与合并后源码不一致的问题。在精确基线 4a41193de827b48b4d09efb9b84f92366ae62a0b，同一生成器因 1 个未登记的 codec 读取点及 11 处位置漂移退出 1；该 PR 恢复现有门禁，不改变运行时 registry I/O。

改动思路

沿用源码 AST 扫描器生成站点、既有 manifest 保存分类、验证器比较两者的单一所有权。此次只将新增的 activation_service._projected_source_identity 的 load_registry 登记为 codec_api，并更新 11 个已有站点的派生位置；没有新增例外或第二套清单。

具体改动

关键代码讲解

• loopx/semantics/project_registry_io_manifest_v1.json：新增上述读取点（源码第 91 行）；其余 manager context、Chat、Goal activation、Lark 和 global registry 站点仅调整 line／column。已有站点的 ID、API、kind 与 classification 不变。
• 现有 build_project_registry_io_manifest 仍从源码推导位置，validate_project_registry_io_manifest 仍拒绝未登记站点或漂移。基线实际报出 1+11 项，新 head 的同一检查报告 232 sites current。

对主干的风险

PR 仅修改一个生成清单文件（+20/−12），不修改运行时调用或分类规则。独立检出运行生成器检查通过，相关架构测试 9 passed，git diff --check 通过；当前 origin/main 等于 PR 基线，git merge-tree 无冲突。未等待或采信 CI 作为本结论的依据。若合并前主干再移动源码站点，需要重跑生成器。

语义与 CI 对齐

继续复用 loopx_project_registry_io_manifest_v1 及 codec_api 词汇，未放宽“未分类直接 I/O”门禁。PR 正文仍写旧 head 的“四处／231 sites”，作者的 exact-head 评论已更新为 232；建议同步正文，避免后续审阅者误读。

我的整体评价

对精确 head 52c6bdf244c9de129f255544951fa91219c174d4 给出 APPROVE。基线失败与 head 通过形成直接对照；变更局限在既有生成物，毗邻边界已有集中生成器，无需额外重构或抽象。结论不覆盖未来的主干源码移动。

English verdict: APPROVE - exact head 52c6bdf; the canonical manifest now records 232 classified sites. The base check failed on one missing site and 11 location drifts; the head check and nine architecture tests passed. Please refresh the superseded PR description for clarity.