You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems now the Lightning implementations do not allow for mutually funded channels; its not bidirectional by default.
I created a channel and i don't have any inbound capacity on that very channel. Then I send some bitcoin to the other side, Can i receive the money back by the same channel without gererating an invoice?
After reading through this whole issues management, but i found nothing about this thread; Of sure, I'll check the docs too; If I missed something, thanks for pointing me that.
I created a channel and i don't have any inbound capacity on that very channel. Then I send some bitcoin to the other side, Can i receive the money back by the same channel without gererating an invoice?
No. There's WIP for key send txs, look at PR #2455 but this is not in the current implementation.
The title and body on this feature request seem unrealated to me? There are two issues here:
Title - Mutually funded channels: assuming this means the ability for both parties to contribute funds to a channel on creation. This is generally referred to as dual funded channels, and there is a PR open to the BOLTS here.
Body - invoiceless sends: The ability to send to a node without an invoice, which currently has a WIP PR out as @molxyz points out
Activity
[-][Feature Request][/-][+][Feature Request] mutually funded channels implementation[/+]molxyz commentedon Nov 4, 2019
@brain-zhang
No. There's WIP for
key sendtxs, look at PR #2455 but this is not in the current implementation.carlaKC commentedon Nov 4, 2019
The title and body on this feature request seem unrealated to me? There are two issues here:
Which one of these are you after?
brain-zhang commentedon Nov 4, 2019
Dear @molxyz and @carlaKC , Thank you for your guidance; I think WIP is the extremeccly feature what i want;
Sorry for I'd never noticed it before; and then i'll identified as Duplicate of #2455
brain-zhang commentedon Nov 4, 2019
Duplicate of #2455
Roasbeef commentedon Nov 6, 2019
@brain-zhang, you can use Loop to resolve this.