You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Typed Racket ones are tricky because I need to figure out where the rules should live. If they go in resyntax, then resyntax needs a dependency on TR. If they go in TR, or some sort of resyntax-for-TR addon, then I need to figure out a way for resyntax to discover the rules. Maybe for now I just shove them into resyntax and see how that goes.
There's been a little progress here: it is now possible to define third-party refactoring rules using the resyntax/base API. So making some Typed Racket refactoring rules is something anyone can do. I haven't attempted yet, however.
Activity
jackfirth commentedon Jan 12, 2021
Typed Racket ones are tricky because I need to figure out where the rules should live. If they go in
resyntax, thenresyntaxneeds a dependency on TR. If they go in TR, or some sort of resyntax-for-TR addon, then I need to figure out a way forresyntaxto discover the rules. Maybe for now I just shove them intoresyntaxand see how that goes.jackfirth commentedon Oct 3, 2024
There's been a little progress here: it is now possible to define third-party refactoring rules using the
resyntax/baseAPI. So making some Typed Racket refactoring rules is something anyone can do. I haven't attempted yet, however.