Skip to content

AI in Metascience: publish the provisional programme - #876

Open
LukasWallrich wants to merge 16 commits into
mainfrom
ai-metascience-programme
Open

AI in Metascience: publish the provisional programme#876
LukasWallrich wants to merge 16 commits into
mainfrom
ai-metascience-programme

Conversation

@LukasWallrich

@LukasWallrich LukasWallrich commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds the programme to /ai-metascience/, replacing the "full programme will be available here in early September" placeholder.

Intended to merge on 2 September, which is the date the registration announcement gave. Holding it until then leaves room to absorb any further withdrawals.

What is on the page

Day, half-day, session, talk title, speaker. 32 accepted submissions plus the two invited talks, in running order. Clicking a talk opens its abstract in a modal.

What is deliberately not on it

No clock times. Presenter availability was never collected, so every slot is inferred from a submitted time zone and is still being confirmed. One reply moves everything after it in its session. Day plus morning or afternoon is what a reader in another time zone needs in order to decide whether to register. Times land on 10 September, as the page says.

How the block is maintained

Everything between <!-- PROGRAMME:START --> and <!-- PROGRAMME:END --> is generated by build/public_programme.py in the (private) submission-review repo, from the same records the committee decided on. It refuses to build unless every accepted submission appears exactly once, so the page cannot drift from the decisions. Rerunning it on 10 September replaces the block in place.

Everything outside the markers — the CSS and the section intro — is hand-written and safe to edit here.

Notes

  • One accepted talk (Boero, Declarative, Neurosymbolic Systematic Reviews) was withdrawn after the decisions went out and is left off.
  • The layout went through a design pass: session headings outweigh talk titles, the day/half-day/session rhythm is separated, each row carries a chevron saying it opens something, rows meet the 44px touch target, and a long abstract scrolls inside the dialog rather than running off a phone screen. The 375px rendering has not been eyeballed — worth a look in the staging render.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Replaces the "programme coming in early September" placeholder with the
sessions and the talks in each, in running order.

No clock times and no abstracts: presenter availability was never collected,
so every slot is still being confirmed with the authors. One reply moves
everything after it in its session, and a day plus morning or afternoon is
what a reader in another time zone needs in order to decide. Times and
abstracts follow on 10 September.

The block between the PROGRAMME markers is generated by
build/public_programme.py in the submission-review repo, which reads the same
submission records the committee decided on. Rerun it to refresh the block.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@LukasWallrich
LukasWallrich requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2026 22:16
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍 All image files/references (if any) are in webp format, in line with our policy.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📝 Spell Check Results

Found 13 potential spelling issue(s) when checking 64 changed file(s):

📄 content/ai-metascience/index.md

Line Issue
306 Harware ==> Hardware
306 nWe ==> new
306 nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
306 nWe ==> new
306 nWe ==> new
306 nWe ==> new
306 nWe ==> new

📄 layouts/glossary/single.html

Line Issue
32 Referenz ==> Reference

📄 layouts/partials/glossary_feedback_form.html

Line Issue
27 oder ==> order, older, coder, odder, odor, over, doer
27 oder ==> order, older, coder, odder, odor, over, doer
31 Referenz ==> Reference
34 oder ==> order, older, coder, odder, odor, over, doer
59 bu ==> by, be, but, bug, bun, bud, buy, bum

ℹ️ How to address these issues:

  1. Fix the typo: If it's a genuine typo, please correct it.
  2. Add to whitelist: If it's a valid word (e.g., a name, technical term), add it to .codespell-ignore.txt
  3. False positive: If this is a false positive, please report it in the PR comments.

🤖 This check was performed by codespell

…ading

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@LukasWallrich

LukasWallrich commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Staging Deployment Status

This PR has been successfully deployed to staging as part of an aggregated deployment.

Deployed at: 2026-09-08 11:24:08 UTC
Staging URL: https://staging.forrt.org

The staging site shows the combined state of all compatible open PRs.

LukasWallrich and others added 8 commits August 29, 2026 00:37
Every talk row opens its abstract in a modal, so the page carries the full
content rather than a list of titles. The abstracts come from the same
submission records the committee decided on.

Layout, after a design pass:
- Session headings now outweigh talk titles, so the page can be read by
  session rather than talk by talk.
- Vertical rhythm separates day, half-day and session instead of running them
  together.
- A chevron on each row says it opens something; hovering no longer shifts the
  text sideways.
- Rows are at least 44px tall, the half-day label meets contrast, and a long
  abstract scrolls inside the dialog instead of running off a phone screen.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…mitted ones

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…at TalTech

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…Tuesday

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ternoon

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@richarddushime richarddushime left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aprouving checks so that you can merge it anytime

LukasWallrich and others added 6 commits September 2, 2026 16:37
…iew and programme

The generated programme block is styled with CSS only, so the build script
in the submission-review repo needs no change. Talk titles use the site
link colour to show they open the abstract.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CgrBfhmD8tnz31EGkzbmMR
Almarzouq, Helmy and Yamada rewrote their abstracts after the committee asked
for more detail; Helmy's talk is retitled "The FOCUS Framework: Ten Simple
Rules...". Peder Isager is at Oslo New University College.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two late submissions from TU Eindhoven, accepted into one shared 20-minute
slot opening "Evaluating science, and its evaluators". Mesquida presents on
behalf of both, so the session gains a talk and nobody else moves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sahu, Kruzenshtern and Elton rewrote their abstracts; Elton's talk is now
"...and experiments with AI for forensic metascience", covering the forensic
work he started in August.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ineichen sent a title and abstract aimed at non-specialists, and the symposium
description now follows it. Yamada's talk runs 20 minutes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ineichen lectures across its current slot, so the session keeps its place in
Tuesday morning under a visible "timing to be confirmed" label rather than
implying a time that is not settled.

Also: Sawyer's revised abstract, Mesquida presenting alone after all, and the
symposium's own title, which a stale line in the builder had been overwriting
with the committee's paraphrase.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants