🗑️ Deprecate const and unique_items in Field - #1732
Open
YuriiMotov wants to merge 8 commits into
Open
Conversation
YuriiMotov
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 29, 2026 13:30
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
tiangolo
reviewed
Aug 28, 2026
tiangolo
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you! 🙌
Yes, I think it's a good idea to just raise the error, if this has never worked with Pydantic v2, better to not have it around and just show the error.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
…-unique_items-in-field
…-unique_items-in-field
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
constandunique_itemsparameters inFieldare deprecated in Pydantic V2 (const, unique_items):This PR reflects this change.
These parameters don't work (just ignored) on current SQLModel version. And they never worked with SQLMOdel + Pydantic V2.
So, not sure we need to mark this PR as
breaking, but I did it it worked in some previous versions with Pydantic V1