[trivikr]

Replace seven near-identical checks in the publish action with a single loop over [flag, value] pairs.

Warnings and their order are unchanged.

[netomi]

The refactor looks correct and behaviour-neutral: same conditions, same order, and none of the seven options has a default, so each is undefined unless passed, as the old checks assumed. Clearing target unconditionally inside the block is equivalent.

A few points, the first one for this PR:

1. No test covers the warnings. cli/test/unit/main.spec.ts has no case for the "Ignoring option" warnings, so "warnings and their order are unchanged" isn't checked. A spec that publishes a prepackaged file with all seven flags and asserts the warnings in order would cover it.

The rest is pre-existing and better suited to a follow-up:

2. The --packagePath route warns about nothing. ovsx publish -i ext.vsix --target linux-x64 --baseContentUrl ... silently drops the target and the other packaging options: doPublish (publish.ts:72-76) turns the .vsix path into extensionFile and deletes target. The same flags with a positional ext.vsix do warn.
3. The ignore rule lives in two places. These seven options are checked in main.ts, while --pre-release is warned about separately in publish.ts:85. Moving the whole list into doPublish, after extensionFile is resolved, would fix 2 and 3 together: one list, both entry routes, --pre-release included.
4. Minor: only target is cleared, so the other "ignored" options still reach publish(). Nothing reads them on the prepackaged route today, so it has no effect yet. The flag names are hand-written strings that could drift from the .option(...) declarations if one is renamed.

[trivikr]

1. No test covers the warnings

Added in f7482cb