Skip to content

Improve CI coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences #500

Open

Description

@mattansb

Open a new issue / pr to discuss improving the CI covered for all of these methods - since they are all monotonic transformations of one another, it makes sense to me they can be improved together.

Originally posted by @mattansb in #496 (comment)

Also related to #479

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Improve coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences[/-] [+]Improve CI coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences[/+] on Sep 24, 2022
  2. mattansb commented on Sep 24, 2022

    @mattansb
    MemberAuthor

    @arcaldwell49 feel free to contribute here if you'd like, there is not rush or pressure (:

  3. bwiernik commented on Sep 29, 2022

    @bwiernik
    Contributor

    The fisher z transformation applies to Pearson r and approximately to phi — it will undercover for any rank correlation or continuity correction like biserial, tetrachoric, or polychoric unless the n is adjusted downward

    metafor::escalc has sampling error formulas for some of these I believe

  4. arcaldwell49 commented on Sep 29, 2022

    @arcaldwell49
    Contributor

    Very good points @bwiernik . Also, I noticed an error in my code where I ran some simulations earlier this month.... The issue may be mute, but let me re-run the simulations to check.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions