You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Improve CI coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences #500
Open a new issue / pr to discuss improving the CI covered for all of these methods - since they are all monotonic transformations of one another, it makes sense to me they can be improved together.
changed the title [-]Improve coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences[/-][+]Improve CI coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences[/+]on Sep 24, 2022
The fisher z transformation applies to Pearson r and approximately to phi — it will undercover for any rank correlation or continuity correction like biserial, tetrachoric, or polychoric unless the n is adjusted downward
metafor::escalc has sampling error formulas for some of these I believe
Very good points @bwiernik . Also, I noticed an error in my code where I ran some simulations earlier this month.... The issue may be mute, but let me re-run the simulations to check.
Activity
[-]Improve coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences[/-][+]Improve CI coverage for non-parametric CLES and rank differences[/+]mattansb commentedon Sep 24, 2022
@arcaldwell49 feel free to contribute here if you'd like, there is not rush or pressure (:
bwiernik commentedon Sep 29, 2022
The fisher z transformation applies to Pearson r and approximately to phi — it will undercover for any rank correlation or continuity correction like biserial, tetrachoric, or polychoric unless the n is adjusted downward
metafor::escalc has sampling error formulas for some of these I believe
arcaldwell49 commentedon Sep 29, 2022
Very good points @bwiernik . Also, I noticed an error in my code where I ran some simulations earlier this month.... The issue may be mute, but let me re-run the simulations to check.