Skip to content

Update with current v7.0-dev - #695

Open
StuartWheater wants to merge 148 commits into
v7.0-dev_perf-profile-updatefrom
v7.0-dev
Open

StuartWheater wants to merge 148 commits into
v7.0-dev_perf-profile-updatefrom
v7.0-dev

Conversation

@StuartWheater

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
⏳ 3 of 5 checks reported so far
CheckResult
Devtools checks✅ passed
Code quality⏳ pending
Armadillo unit tests[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 27 | PASS 11186 ]
Opal unit tests[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 27 | PASS 11208 ]
Test coverageℹ️ no coverable lines changed (project: 61.2%)

Tested against dsBase versions:
Armadillo: 7.0.0.9000
Opal: 7.0.0.9000

Logs: Devtools checks · pending · Armadillo unit tests · Opal unit tests · Codecov

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
⏳ 0 of 5 checks reported so far
CheckResult
Devtools checks⏳ pending
Code quality⏳ pending
Armadillo unit tests⏳ pending
Opal unit tests⏳ pending
Test coverage⏳ pending

Tested against dsBase versions:
Armadillo: pending
Opal: pending

Logs: pending · pending · pending · pending · pending

@github-advanced-security github-advanced-security AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lintr found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (v7.0-dev_perf-profile-update@c5ef152). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##             v7.0-dev_perf-profile-update     #695   +/-   ##
===============================================================
  Coverage                                ?   61.16%           
===============================================================
  Files                                   ?      142           
  Lines                                   ?     6120           
  Branches                                ?        0           
===============================================================
  Hits                                    ?     3743           
  Misses                                  ?     2377           
  Partials                                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
armadillo-arg 21.01% <ø> (?)
armadillo-misc 15.98% <ø> (?)
armadillo-perf-1 4.33% <ø> (?)
armadillo-perf-2 13.15% <ø> (?)
armadillo-perf-3 9.42% <ø> (?)
armadillo-smk-1 29.82% <ø> (?)
armadillo-smk-2 37.02% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

expect_length(res.errors, 3)
expect_match(res.errors$sim1, "The server-side object must be of type factor. 'D\\$LAB_TSC' is type numeric.")
expect_match(res.errors$sim2, "The server-side object must be of type factor. 'D\\$LAB_TSC' is type numeric.")
expect_match(res.errors$sim3, "The server-side object must be of type factor. 'D\\$LAB_TSC' is type numeric.")

expect_length(res.errors, 3)
expect_match(res.errors$sim1, "The server-side object must be of type factor. 'D\\$LAB_TSC' is type numeric.")
expect_match(res.errors$sim2, "The server-side object must be of type factor. 'D\\$LAB_TSC' is type numeric.")
res.errors <- DSI::datashield.errors()

expect_length(res.errors, 3)
expect_match(res.errors$sim1, "The server-side object must be of type factor. 'D\\$LAB_TSC' is type numeric.")
Comment thread R/ds.changeRefGroup.R
# check that the new object has been created and display a message accordingly
finalcheck <- isAssigned(datasources, newobj)
calltext <- call("changeRefGroupDS", x, ref, reorderByRef)
DSI::datashield.assign(datasources, newobj, calltext)
Comment thread tests/testthat/setup.R Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants