Skip to content

Validate review-summary edge cases before the real-issue experiment #10

Description

@mchwang

Copilot's final review of PR #9 (e582882) reported Findings: None and no new inline comments, but its summary retained references to two moderate concerns and a styling nit. All ten concrete review threads are resolved. Preserve these summary-only concerns for targeted validation rather than treating the summary as proof of a reproduced bug.

  • Validate manual reassignment of a renamed file against both old and new declared paths (runner/review.ts).
  • Validate literal filenames containing Git pathspec metacharacters in the declared-file transition check (scripts/plant.ts).
  • Check status styling for accepted changes; the explicit “Accepted outside plan” label already has browser coverage, but no additional styling example was supplied.

Reproduce each issue before modifying behavior and add focused regression coverage for any confirmed defect. Complete this check before using these edge cases in the real-issue experiment for #3.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions