[core][WIP] Optimize Parquet point lookup I/O on OSS - #9695
Draft
leaves12138 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
[WIP] Reduce remote I/O overhead for Parquet point lookups, particularly when a global BTree index already provides row IDs.
FileIO.newInputStream(Path, long)overload and forward it through the relevant FileIO proxies. Implementations without the optimization retain the existing path.This is a read-path change; it does not change the data/index file formats or disable predicate checks. The draft status is intentional for API and connector review.
Earlier synthetic tests on two fixed 100-billion-row snapshots, using identical UUIDs and Java 11 clients, showed:
For one representative page-index lookup, Parquet I/O decreased from 26 GETs + 1 HEAD to 7 GETs, and response-body bytes decreased from 11.71 MB to 4.25 MB. These are client API measurements, not SQL-service end-to-end latency or a production SLA. They were collected on the earlier benchmarked base; this draft is rebased onto current master.
Tests
git diff --check.