Repository navigation
fix(python): accept only booleans for is_time, as the schema does #557
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct on the mechanics, and the laundering is the same shape: {"is_time": null} is schema-invalid, the model accepts it, and exclude_none=True drops the key so the output validates.
I'd rather not fix it in this PR, because it isn't specific to is_time. ossie-schema.json permits null for no property anywhere, and all 27 Optional[...] fields in the SDK accept an explicit null and serialize it away — OssieField.model_validate({..., "label": None, "description": None, "datatype": None}) succeeds today and emits a document with those keys simply absent.
The two problems differ in kind. Lax coercion is per-field and per-type, and StrictBool fixes it; this PR applies that to the only "type": "boolean" in the schema. Explicit-null acceptance follows from Optional[X] = None being how pydantic spells "optional", so it is uniform across the models by construction. Patching it on is_time alone would leave the other 26 unchanged and introduce a one-off idiom the next reader would reasonably question.
Doing it properly means deciding whether the SDK distinguishes an absent key from an explicit null across all 10 models — a behaviour change for any caller currently passing label=None. Nothing in this repository does (I checked every Ossie*(...) construction), but that is a decision worth its own PR and review rather than a rider on this one. I'll open it as a follow-up unless a reviewer would rather keep absent and null interchangeable.