Skip to content

German translation improvements - #115

Merged
elecharny merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
schorschii:de-translations-update3
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

German translation improvements#115
elecharny merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
schorschii:de-translations-update3

Conversation

@schorschii

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Some more translation improvements.

P.S. Is the release of a new version planned?

@elecharny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @schorschii, thanks for the fixes!

Yes, definitively, we intend to get a release soon.

@elecharny elecharny closed this Sep 10, 2026
@schorschii

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for your response, but why did you close the PR without merging?

@elecharny elecharny reopened this Sep 10, 2026
@elecharny
elecharny merged commit 02c7871 into apache:master Sep 10, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
@elecharny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Mpfh... A mistake, I thought I merged it. Sorry for that, I did merge it after having reopened it.

@elecharny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @schorschii,

I was suggested to suppress the negative form to have a lighter sentence:

"Der LDAP-Server {0} unterstützt *nur/ausschließlich* das Verschieben/Umbenennen von Blatt Einträgen

and in english:

"The LDAP server {0} only supports moving/renaming of leaf entries."

to avoid a double negation. What do you think?

@schorschii

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yes, we can do that. In German I suggest:

Der LDAP-Server {0} unterstützt das Verschieben/Umbenennen ausschließlich bei Blatt-Einträgen.

@elecharny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

German seems to be a complex language ;-) So many ways to say the same thing...

@elecharny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Message modified, and I also modified the english/french ones to get rid of the double negation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants