Improve tbots.py target name resolution and interactive experience

[ryanwarfield]

Description

This PR:

• Pulls out ActionArgument and find_fuzzy_target into their own files to avoid circular deps
• Switches the interactive cli to directly call the fuzzy search, and cleans up the flow (no more searching twice if your search doesn't come up with any matches)
• Increase the threshold to skip the search dialogue from tbots.py test x from 50 to 65 (opens more frequently).
• Make the target search dialogue more clear about whats going on
• Include every target in the search dialogue instead of just 10

New Behaviour:

./tbots.py run thunderscope # runs thunderscope_main with no prompt
./tbots.py run e # opens up an interactive search dialog (before it ran some random test)
./tbots.py test e # same thing

./tbots.py
? What would you like to do? Test
? Which tests? Specific test
<search dialogue opens>
? Number of times to run each test (leave empty for 1): 1

# updated build menu
~/h/t/src►./tbots.py 
? What would you like to do? Build
? What would you like to build? (Use arrow keys)
 » Specific target
   Bazel pattern
   All

Dialogue when running ./tbots.py test e

Testing Done

An unhealthy number of runs of tbots.py 💀

Resolved Issues

resolves #3887

Review Checklist

It is the reviewers responsibility to also make sure every item here has been covered

• Function & Class comments: All function definitions (usually in the .h file) should have a javadoc style comment at the start of them. For examples, see the functions defined in thunderbots/software/geom. Similarly, all classes should have an associated Javadoc comment explaining the purpose of the class.
• Remove all commented out code
• Remove extra print statements: for example, those just used for testing
• Resolve all TODO's: All TODO (or similar) statements should either be completed or associated with a github issue

[StarrryNight]

Left some small nits but looks great to me! Tested it myself and it works pretty well.

[StarrryNight]

🚀

[GrantYu9]

Overall looks good to me.

I like the expanded amount of results shown and matched results.

I'm unsure of the logistics or benefits of this, but I was thinking we could also add a "Run" option along with the other options:

I'll probably open this as another issue.