Skip to content

Setup bug bots #472

Description

@janosh

coderabbit is configured to require manual invocation which means that bugs usually caught by LLM reviews may slip through.

enabled: false

it's by far the most verbose LLM reviewer so i understand the motivation. https://chatgpt.com/codex, https://cursor.com/bugbot etc. have gotten good and less verbose and likely would have prevented things like the wrong autobatch scaling for mixed PBC. we should setup one or both for https://github.com/TorchSim/torch-sim

Activity

  1. added
    bugSomething isn't working
    ciContinuous integration
    dxDeveloper experience
    on Feb 28, 2026
  2. orionarcher commented on Feb 28, 2026

    @orionarcher
    Collaborator

    I think having a automated reviewer that is hyperfocused on bug finding would be valuable. I think it would be significantly less verbose if we provided a prompt to steer it to only comment on logic that is actually wrong, as opposed to just stylistic.

  3. deleted a comment from thomasloux on Mar 16, 2026
  4. deleted a comment from janosh on Mar 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't workingciContinuous integrationdxDeveloper experience

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions