Research correct CRE mapping for K09 (Misconfigured Cluster Components) in OWASP Kubernetes Top Ten 2022 #916

Activity

1. SurbhiAgarwal1 commented on Jun 10, 2026

   

   SurbhiAgarwal1

   on Jun 10, 2026

   Last edited by SurbhiAgarwal1

   More actions

   Hi @Pa04rth , Can you assign me this issue?
2. Pa04rth commented on Jun 11, 2026

   

   Pa04rth

   on Jun 11, 2026

   Collaborator

   More actions

   @SurbhiAgarwal1 Assigned !
3. Pa04rth

   assigned

   Pa04rth

   and

   SurbhiAgarwal1

   and unassigned

   Pa04rth

   on Jun 11, 2026
4. Bornunique911 commented on Jul 8, 2026

   

   Bornunique911

   on Jul 8, 2026

   Contributor

   More actions

   Please modify references accordingly with the new PR's.
   @coderabbitai review
5. coderabbitai commented on Jul 8, 2026

   

   coderabbitaibot

   on Jul 8, 2026 – with coderabbitai

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   🧩 Analysis chain

   🏁 Script executed:

   #!/bin/bash
   gh issue view 916 --repo OWASP/OpenCRE --comments

   Length of output: 577

   ---

   🏁 Script executed:

   #!/bin/bash
   gh issue view 916 --repo OWASP/OpenCRE

   Length of output: 2563

   ---

   🏁 Script executed:

   #!/bin/bash
   gh pr list --repo OWASP/OpenCRE --search "916" --state all
   gh pr list --repo OWASP/OpenCRE --search "K09" --state all
   gh pr list --repo OWASP/OpenCRE --search "kubernetes" --state all --limit 30

   Length of output: 1986

   ---

   🏁 Script executed:

   #!/bin/bash
   gh pr view 927 --repo OWASP/OpenCRE --json title,body,url,files

   Length of output: 2900

   ---

   🏁 Script executed:

   #!/bin/bash
   set -euo pipefail
   
   body=$(cat <<'EOF'
   ## Context
   
   This issue tracks follow-up research to find the correct, distinct CRE identifiers for **K09: Misconfigured Cluster Components** in the OWASP Kubernetes Top Ten 2022 dataset.
   
   ## Background
   
   In PR `#877`, the `owasp_kubernetes_top10_2022.json` mapping for K09 was intentionally left unchanged because it currently shares the same `cre_ids` as K01 (`["233-748", "486-813"]`). After reviewing the upstream OWASP source, a clearly correct distinct replacement could not be identified, so a speculative change was avoided to prevent introducing incorrect data.
   
   **K09** is focused on hardening and misconfiguration of core cluster components (e.g., `kubelet`, `etcd`, `kube-apiserver`), with prevention guidance centred on secure configuration, CIS benchmark scans, and reducing unsafe defaults.
   
   ## Open question
   
   Is there a more specific CRE mapping for cluster-component hardening/misconfiguration that should replace or augment the current `["233-748", "486-813"]` entries for K09?
   
   ## Guidance for review
   
   - Compare K09's prevention/mitigation content on the [OWASP Kubernetes Top Ten 2022 page](https://owasp.org/www-project-kubernetes-top-ten/2022/en/src/K09-misconfigured-cluster-components) against the CRE database.
   - Note that the OWASP Kubernetes Top Ten 2025 appears to consolidate this area under **K07: Misconfigured And Vulnerable Cluster Components** — the 2025 mapping (PR `#877`, `owasp_kubernetes_top10_2025.json`) may provide useful pointers for the correct CRE IDs.
   - If no better mapping exists, the duplication with K01 should be explicitly documented in the data file (e.g., via a comment or a companion note) so future maintainers understand it is intentional.
   
   ## References
   
   - PR `#877`: https://github.com/OWASP/OpenCRE/pull/877
   - PR `#927` (implementation for this issue): https://github.com/OWASP/OpenCRE/pull/927
   - Comment thread: https://github.com/OWASP/OpenCRE/pull/877#discussion_r3351547169
   - OWASP K09 source: https://owasp.org/www-project-kubernetes-top-ten/2022/en/src/K09-misconfigured-cluster-components
   - OWASP K07 (2025 consolidation): https://owasp.org/www-project-kubernetes-top-ten/
   EOF
   )
   
   gh issue edit 916 --repo OWASP/OpenCRE --body "$body"
   gh issue view 916 --repo OWASP/OpenCRE

   Length of output: 4920

   ---

   @Bornunique911, I've updated the References section of issue #916 to add a link to PR #927 ("Research k09 mapping" by @SurbhiAgarwal1), which implements the fix (adding the "note" field to document the intentional K09/K01 CRE duplication) and closes this issue.

   Note: since this thread is on an issue rather than a pull request, the @coderabbitai review command doesn't apply here — that command triggers a code review only on pull request diffs. If you'd like a review of the actual code changes, please post @coderabbitai review as a comment on PR #927 directly, and I'll review it there.

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Bornunique911