You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
docs: publish the cost model for a real deployment #298
"Serverless and cheap, running inside your own AWS account" is the clearest differentiator Junando has against Keep, Grafana and Datadog — none of which can match it. But that claim is currently nowhere in the docs, so nobody evaluating the project can see it.
Content
A cost page with two worked scenarios (small app, large noisy app), broken down per component: Lambda, SQS, dedup store, LLM tokens. Show the free-tier headroom explicitly, and compare model choices (Nova Lite vs Claude Haiku).
Prerequisite — do not skip
The current estimates assume ~3,000 input tokens and ~500 output tokens per analysis, and a 3:1 alert-to-cluster correlation ratio. These are assumptions, not measurements. Before publishing:
Instrument actual token counts from a real analysis with the current prompt
Measure the real correlation ratio on a realistic alert stream
Publishing unverified numbers on the main differentiator would be worse than publishing nothing.
Done when
The docs site has a cost page backed by measured token counts, not estimates.
Activity
docs(301): remove dead CLUSTER_WINDOW_MS, fix stale docs, verify quic…