Repository navigation
Conversation
Member
Author
|
The desktop file does not pass validation: According to the menu spec,
Hence, please add at least one of the following in the
In addition, you could specify one or more from the longer list of Additional Categories. Please test the result with Additionally, these libraries should not be bundled inside AppImages since it can prevent the application from running correctly: How did you build this AppImage? |
This was referenced Jul 25, 2018
Contributor
|
Any update? |
Member
Author
|
For unknown reasons, the automated test could not find a single window on screen :-( |
github-actions
Bot
added
the
error-download
Contributor
❌ Test failureFirst error in the log: |
Contributor
|
The AppImages now seem to be available directly on GitHub: https://github.com/ok2cqr/cqrlog/releases Latest one: https://github.com/ok2cqr/cqrlog/releases/download/v3.2.1/CQRLOG-3.2.1-QT5-x86_64.AppImage |
github-actions
Bot
added
error-other
probonopd
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2026
When an AppImage contains the icon twice in the searched folders (e.g. CQRLOG, #527: usr/share/cqrlog/images/icon/128x128/cqrlog.png and usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/cqrlog.png), ICONFILE held two paths, readlink -f failed and the test aborted without a message. Use find -print -quit (not | head -n 1, which could fail under pipefail). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DZvaN9tm5taf5avUvVtmyq
probonopd
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2026
…without log flood (#3926) * retest-prs.sh: -u to re-test PRs without a test result label; skip deleted forks -u selects open PRs that change one file in data/ and have neither screenshot-ok nor an error-* label, except those whose test is still queued or running or awaits approval. PRs whose fork was deleted are skipped in all modes, since GitHub cannot reopen them once closed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DZvaN9tm5taf5avUvVtmyq * check-libc.sh: glibc requirement from 99% of the ELF files; no null-byte warnings X-AppImage-Glibc-Required was the newest version referenced by any ELF file. In SageMath 10.9 (1438 dynamically linked files, built on manylinux2014), 1437 need at most glibc 2.17 and a single debugpy helper (pydevd attach_linux_amd64.so, only loaded to attach a debugger) needs 2.34, so the page claimed 2.34. Now the newest version that 99% of the files need counts (below 100 files, all of them); the files left out are listed in the log. The runtime still counts in full. Also detect ELF files with od instead of $(head -c 4), which made bash print a warning for every binary file (1.6 MB of log for SageMath). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DZvaN9tm5taf5avUvVtmyq * check-libc.sh: count every ELF file again (revert the 99% rule) Every ELF file in the AppImage counts, even one that is only loaded in rare cases (like debugpy's attach helper in SageMath, loaded by the bundled Python), since it is part of the AppImage. Keeps the od-based ELF detection, which avoids a bash warning for every binary file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DZvaN9tm5taf5avUvVtmyq * AGENTS.md: how to investigate and answer in PRs (only when asked) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DZvaN9tm5taf5avUvVtmyq * worker.sh: take only the first match when searching for the icon When an AppImage contains the icon twice in the searched folders (e.g. CQRLOG, #527: usr/share/cqrlog/images/icon/128x128/cqrlog.png and usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/cqrlog.png), ICONFILE held two paths, readlink -f failed and the test aborted without a message. Use find -print -quit (not | head -n 1, which could fail under pipefail). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DZvaN9tm5taf5avUvVtmyq --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
@probonopd Ping. :-) |
Member
Author
|
/retest |
github-actions
Bot
added
error-app-exits
Contributor
❌ Test failure@ok2cqr: this pull request adds the AppImage from your GitHub repository to the AppImage catalog; the test reports the following. Could you have a look? Tested:
Compatibility: not self-contained: uses the C library of the system; references glibc 2.38
First error in the log: What next: once the AppImage is fixed (e.g. in a new release), comment |
Contributor
|
I think the latest version should be used instead: #5784 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://github.com/ok2cqr/cqrlog/
https://cqrlog.com/comment/6359